New Grant Programs for Law Enforcement
On July 11, 2022, Governor Wolf signed HB 1421, the Fiscal Code, into law as Act 54 of 2022. The Code established two new grant programs (see pages 7-13 of the bill) within the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) to offer support to local law enforcement agencies. One is called the Local Law Enforcement (LLE) Support Grant Program and the other is called the Gun Violence Investigation and Prosecution (GVIP) Grant Program. You can find more information on each program below.
Accordion
Expand AllClick here for a more accessible versionWhat is the purpose of the LLE Grant Program?
To provide a law enforcement agency with the necessary resources to allow the law enforcement agency to implement information technology improvements, purchase or upgrade equipment, cover nontraditional law enforcement personnel costs, support retention and recruitment efforts, and provide necessary training and cover related expenses.
Who can apply?
Local law enforcement agencies (defined as: "A public agency of a political subdivision having general police powers and charged with making arrests in connection with the enforcement of the criminal or traffic laws"), campus police or university police, railroad or street railway police (e.g., SEPTA police), airport authority police department, and a county park police force (i.e., Westmoreland County Park Police).
How can eligible applicants use the funds?
The funding is limited to certain categories and PCCD must prioritize funding for applicants with high rates of crime or low clearance rates. Eligible applicants will be able to apply for a grant to implement information technology improvements, purchase or upgrade equipment, cover non-traditional law enforcement personnel costs, support retention and recruitment efforts, and provide necessary training and cover related expenses.
Eligible applicants may use awarded funding for the following:
1. Purchase and upgrade technology and information technology improvements including, but not limited to:
- Record management systems
- Report management systems
- National Incident-based reporting system updates
2. Purchase and upgrade hardware and software equipment, including, but not limited to:
- Body-worn cameras
- Vehicle cameras
- Mobile information technology equipment
3. Support non-sworn personnel costs, including, but not limited to:
- Civilian personnel
- Co-responder models
- Crisis intervention specialists
- Civilian community relations specialists
4. Support non-reoccurring personnel costs for sworn officers, including, but not limited to:
- Officer wellness programs
- Programs that support increased diversity
- Retention and recruitment programs
5. Support policy development, evidence-based practices and training, including, but not limited to:
- Crisis intervention training
- Use of force training
- Implicit bias training
- De-escalation training
- Associated costs related to training
How much total funding is available?
$135 million in federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding is available to fund this grant program, however, there are limitations in the amount of funding that can be received by any eligible applicant based on the population of the municipality served.
The max amounts are listed below, and population must be determined based on the most recent census data.
Funding Caps | |
Municipality Size/Population | Max Award Amount |
City of first class | $ 25,000,000.00 |
City of second class | $ 20,000,000.00 |
Municipality size greater than 55,000 | $ 10,000,000.00 |
Municipality size between 18,000-55,000 | $ 5,000,000.00 |
Municipality under 18,000 | $ 1,000,000.00 |
Transit Agency or Campus Police | $ 5,000,000.00 |
Airport police or county park police | $ 500,000.00 |
How will this application be reviewed?
The grant solicitation is competitive and PCCD is required by law to prioritize issuing grants to areas of Pennsylvania with high rates of violence or to law enforcement agencies with low clearance rates (i.e., lower ability to solve crimes).
PCCD encourages applicants to give careful consideration to what they are asking for in their grant application and provide clear and practical justification for their funding requests. Applicants are discouraged from "throwing in the kitchen sink" to apply for the statutory maximum amount for their department. A recommended strategy is to put time and effort into determining what you need the MOST, and crafting your application and budget accordingly, even if it means applying for less than your statutory maximum.
When will I be able to apply?
The application period is now OPEN and will be OPEN until October 13, 2022. Please see the funding announcement webpage for the actual written solicitation and directions on how to submit an application.
If I am successful in receiving funding, when will I find out?
The final determination of who receives funding will be made at one of PCCD's Commission meetings. It is anticipated that the funds will be awarded in December 2022.
How should I get prepared to apply?
First, if you haven't done so already, sign up to receive notifications as to when solicitations are released in our Egrants system.
Second, create an account and register your agency in Egrants, PCCDs grant application system. Click here for a step-by-step walkthrough of the agency sign-up process, and click here to sign up. Other Egrants access information can be found at the bottom of our Grant Guides page as well.
Third, start gathering information NOW that will be used to explain the need for the requested funding and prioritize what is needed.
The following list of information items is the predicted minimum of what will be requested of grant applicants. Some questions will be relevant for all applicants, while others only relate to the particular category/item of funding for which an applicant is seeking funding. In all cases the applicant will be expected to describe how their project will impact violent crime rates and/or improve clearance rates. Applicants will be expected to provide an analysis of need related to their request and where applicable a description of the acknowledged best practice and where their department stands compared to that best practice standard.
Every applicant will be asked to provide the following information:
- The applicant's ORI
- Whether or not the agency covers their jurisdiction on a full or part-time basis
- The way the agency reported data to PSP in 2019, 2020 and 2021 (e.g., UCR, NIBRS, etc.)
- Number of full-time sworn law enforcement personnel
- Number of part-time sworn law enforcement personnel
- Number of full-time civilian personnel
- Number of part-time civilian personnel
- Number of vacant, budgeted, full-time sworn law enforcement positions (in other words, how many positions the applicant could hire for, if there were people to fill them)
- Number of vacant, budgeted, part-time sworn law enforcement positions (in other words, how many positions the applicant could hire for, if there were people to fill them)
- Three-year average budget of the LLE agency
Applicants may be requested to provide the following information pending the availability of data from UCR and NIBRS:
- Information related to the calculation of the applicant's violent crime rates, to include:
- The applicant's actual/substantiated violent crimes for calendar years 2019, 2020 and 2021
- A jurisdiction's violent crime rate includes the following substantiated "Crime Index" offenses: a.) murder, b.) nonnegligent manslaughter, c.) rape, d.) robbery, and e.) aggravated assault
- Information related to the applicant's clearance rate for calendar years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Clearance rate is defined as a jurisdiction's percentage of substantiated crimes cleared by arrest in a given year. Applicants may need to provide:
- Total number of actual/substantiated crimes (all crimes) annually
- Total number of actual/substantiated crimes cleared by arrest annually
If applying under Category 1: Technology and IT Improvements, applicants should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Type of records and/or report management system (RMS) the applicant currently has and the type the applicant plans to upgrade to
- Whether they intend to improve their data reporting by upgrading to the NIBRS system
- The type of upgrades the applicant is intending to make to improve the RMS and how it will improve their ability to report accurate crime statistics to PSP/the FBI via UCR or NIBRS
- Description of any other type of IT improvements the applicant intends to make with funding, and why their department needs to make them
- Description of how items requested under this category will help in decreasing violence rates or increasing clearance rates.
- Description of the data that the applicant will gather and provide to PCCD to show how the impact of the funding on their agency
If applying under Category 2: Hardware and Software Equipment, applicants should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Description of the type of hardware or software equipment that the applicant hopes to purchase with the funding and a description of the need
- Number of officers currently equipped with the item or items requested
- Number of officers that should be equipped based on best practice standards
- If replacing equipment, rationale based on best practice standard for that type of equipment
- Description of how the equipment will assist law enforcement in decreasing their violent crime rate or increasing their clearance rate
- Description of the data that the applicant will gather and provide to PCCD to show the impact of the funding on their agency
If applying under Category 3: Non-sworn personnel costs, applicants should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Whether the applicant currently utilizes a civilian supported co-responder or crisis intervention model and whether they intend to start one, improve one, or expand one with this funding
- A description of the need for a co-responder or crisis intervention model and how it will assist the applicant's department
- Whether the applicant currently has civilian forensic lab personnel or other forensic personnel that are supported and whether they intend to support forensic personnel with this funding
- Current workload data for the lab personnel and the expected impact that additional personnel would have on that workload to include a comparison of current status to best practice standards
- Number of vacant civilian positions for which the applicant has available funding
- Need for additional civilian positions and how those positions well help the applicant reduce violent crime or increase clearance rate or otherwise improve their department
- A description of the data the applicant will gather and provide to PCCD to show the impact of the funding on their agency
If applying under Category 4: Non-reoccurring personnel costs for sworn officers, applicants should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Whether the applicant currently offers officer wellness programs to the applicant's sworn officers, what those programs are and whether the applicant plans to increase/improve the programs with this funding
- Whether the applicant currently implements any programs to support increased diversity, what those programs are and whether the applicant intends to do so with this funding
- If the applicant is not seeking funding for officer wellness, or to help increase diversity, specific information about the type of program that the applicant intends to implement for sworn officers and why the program is needed
- A description of how these programs will help the applicant decrease violent crime rates or increase clearance rates
- A description of the applicant's current retention plan for sworn officers
- Whether the applicant plans to use "one-time" funds to improve officer retention and if so, how
- Whether the applicant plans to offer bonuses to existing officers with the funding and if so, how bonus amounts will be determined and how officers will be selected to receive bonuses
- Whether the applicant has a current recruitment plan for sworn officers and whether they intend to utilize these funds to improve or create a recruitment plan and how
- A description of how the proposed recruitment or retention plan will help the department lower violent crime rates or increase clearance rates
- If not applying for funds for items discussed above, a description of how the funds for non-reoccurring personnel costs for sworn officers will be used and how the use of the funds in this way will help the department lower violent crime rates or increase clearance rates
- A description of the data the applicant will gather and provide to PCCD to show the impact of the funding on their agency
If applying under Category 5: Policy development, evidence-based practices and training, the applicant should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Number of sworn law enforcement trained and up to date in crisis intervention
- Number of sworn officers or civilians on staff and certified to train others in crisis intervention
- Number of sworn law enforcement officers trained and up to date in current "use of force" tactics
- Number of sworn officers or civilians on staff certified to train others in "use of force" tactics
- Number of sworn law enforcement trained regarding implicit bias
- Number of sworn officers or civilian staff certified to train others regarding implicit bias
- Number of sworn law enforcement trained in current de-escalation techniques
- Number of sworn officers or civilian staff certified to train others regarding de-escalation techniques
- Type of training the applicant wishes to support with these funds, the number of officers the applicant hopes to support with the training and the reasoning behind the training request.
- A clear description of any other policy development or evidence-based practices and the need for the requested funding to support policy development or evidence-based practices
- A description of how the proposed training, policy development or evidence-based practices will help the agency decrease violent crime rates or increase clearance rates
- A description of the data the applicant will gather and provide to PCCD to show the impact of the funding on their agency
View The GVIP Dashboard on our Gun Violence Data & Research page.
What is the purpose of the GVIP Grant Program?
To make grants to county district attorneys' offices and local law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute the following:
(1) a violation of 18 Pa. C.S. Ch. 31 (relating to firearms and other dangerous articles).
(2) a crime of violence as defined in 42 Pa. C.S. § 9714(g) (relating to sentences for second and subsequent where a firearm or a replica of a firearm, as defined in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712(e) (relating to sentences for offenses committed with firearms), is used in the commission of the crime.
Who can apply?
District Attorneys, local law enforcement agencies (defined as: "A public agency of a political subdivision having general police powers and charged with making arrests in connection with the enforcement of the criminal or traffic laws"), campus police or university police, railroad or street railway police (e.g., SEPTA police), airport authority police department, and a county park police force (i.e., Westmoreland County Park Police).
How can eligible applicants use the funds?
The use of funding is limited to five categories that are designed to allow law enforcement to improve their abilities to investigate gun crimes. Applicants can request funds for the following:
- To improve and enhance coordination of Federal, State, and local law enforcement investigations and prosecutions of violations of 18 Pa.C.S. Ch. 61 and crimes of violence involving firearms.
- To support personnel costs, including salaries and overtime, relating to investigations and prosecutions of violations of 18 Pa.C.S. Ch. 61 and crimes of violence involving firearms, with priority given to applications focusing on straw purchasers and firearms trafficking.
- To purchase technology systems, including related hardware and software, to improve investigations and prosecutions or increase clearance rates, including the purchase of gunshot detection technology and other technologies that support firearm violence reduction initiatives.
- Initiatives that support the tracing of firearms used to commit crimes or delinquent acts and the identification of illegal firearms traffickers.
- Any other efforts that aid in the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of a crime involving firearms.
How much total funding is available?
$50 million in federal American Recuse Plan Act (ARPA) funding is available to fund this grant program, however, there are limitations in the amount of funding that can be received by any applicant based on the population of the municipality served. 10% of available grant funds (i.e., $5 million) will be reserved for county district attorney's offices and law enforcement agencies serving rural communities.
The max amounts are listed below, and population must be determined based on the most recent census data.
Funding Caps | |
Municipality Size/Population | Max Award Amount |
City of first class | $ 25,000,000.00 |
City of second class | $ 20,000,000.00 |
Municipality size greater than 55,000 | $ 10,000,000.00 |
Municipality size between 18,000-55,000 | $ 5,000,000.00 |
Municipality under 18,000 | $ 1,000,000.00 |
Transit Agency or Campus Police | $ 5,000,000.00 |
Airport police or county park police | $ 500,000.00 |
How will this application be reviewed?
The grant solicitation will be competitive and PCCD is required by law to prioritize issuing grants to areas of Pennsylvania with high rates of gun violence.
PCCD encourages applicants to give careful consideration to what they are asking for in their grant application and provide clear and practical justification for their funding requests. Applicants are discouraged from "throwing in the kitchen sink" to apply for the statutory maximum amount for their department or office. A recommended strategy is to put time and effort into determining what you need the MOST, and crafting your application and budget accordingly, even if it means applying for less than your statutory maximum.
When will I be able to apply?
The application period is now OPEN and will be OPEN until October 13, 2022. Please see the funding announcement webpage for the actual written solicitation and directions on how to submit an application.
If I am successful in receiving funding, when will I find out?
The final determination of who receives funding will be made at one of PCCD's Commission meetings. It is anticipated that the funds will be awarded in December 2022.
How should I get prepared to apply?
First, if you haven't done so already, sign up to receive notifications as to when solicitations are released in our Egrants system.
Second, create an account and register your agency in Egrants, PCCDs grant application system. Click here for a step-by-step walkthrough of the agency sign-up process, and click here to sign up. Other Egrants access information can be found at the bottom of our Grant Guides page as well.
Third, start gathering information NOW that you will probably need to provide as part of the application process.
The information below will be the minimum of what is requested. Some questions will be relevant for all applicants, while others only relate to the particular category of funding for which an applicant is seeking funding.
Regardless of the category of application, everyone will be asked to provide the following information:
- Number of full-time sworn law enforcement personnel
- Number of part-time sworn law enforcement personnel
If applying under Category 1: Improve and enhance coordination of federal, state and local LE, the applicant should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Whether the applicant currently has a coordinated gun violence task force, and who is included on the applicant task force.
- If the applicant is planning to improve coordination, who is the applicant planning to include in the applicant's task force or coordinated group (state level investigators, federal investigators, other local LE agencies)
- Letters of support from the agencies that the applicant plans to partner with
- A description of how the coordinated effort will help to reduce gun violence in their jurisdiction
- A description of the data the applicant will collect and provide to PCCD to measure the impact of the project on their jurisdiction
If applying under Category 2: Support Personnel Costs the applicant should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Number of sworn officers/detectives currently employed who work on gun violence investigations
- Description of the need for additional funding to either hire additional officers, or support overtime for existing officers
- A description of how the additional funding for personnel will decrease gun violence in their jurisdiction
- A description of the data the applicant will collect and provide to PCCD to measure the impact of the project on their jurisdiction
If applying under Category 3: Technology systems to support firearm violence reduction initiatives, the applicant should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Whether the applicant currently has gunshot detection technology, what the technology is and how it is used.
- The type and cost of the technology that the applicant intends to purchase, how it works and a description of what it is meant to do.
- A description of how the technology will decrease gun violence in their jurisdiction
- A description of the data the applicant will collect and provide to PCCD to measure the impact of the project on their jurisdiction
If applying under Category 4: Initiatives to support tracing firearms, the applicant should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- Whether the applicant currently has any initiatives in place to support tracing firearms and what they are
- The type and cost of the initiative(s) the applicant intends to put into place to support firearms tracing if awarded this funding
- A description of how the project will decrease gun violence in their jurisdiction
- Letters of support from any stakeholders involved in the tracing initiatives
- A description of the data the applicant will collect and provide to PCCD to measure the impact of the project on their jurisdiction
If applying under Category 5: Other efforts to aid in investigation, arrest and prosecution of crime involving firearms, the applicant should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, the following information, if applicable and relevant to their specific request:
- A detailed description of the type of program or effort that will be made to aid in these investigations
- A detailed description on why this approach will work to improve investigation, arrest and prosecution of gun crimes
- A description of how the project will decrease gun violence in their jurisdiction
- Letters of support from any stakeholders involved in the proposed initiative(s)
- A description of the data the applicant will collect and provide to PCCD to measure the impact of the project on their jurisdiction
Booking with Technology
A cooperative effort between state, county, and local agencies, the Central Booking project integrates the latest technologies for fingerprinting, image identification, video conferencing, and computerized, record management systems.
PCCD’s Office of Criminal Justice System Improvements has helped create over 200 digital booking facilities to ensure; for example, accurate identification of offenders when arrested.
Fingerprinting
The Livescan arrest reporting device replaces the ink-and-roll process with electronic scanning of fingerprints. Digital copies are transmitted to the Automated Fingerprint Identification System at the Pennsylvania State Police for identification and storage. To date, most arrest and fingerprinting information is collected electronically.
Photo imaging
Commonwealth Photo Imaging Network (CPIN) stations capture and store digital photographs of arrested offenders. With CPIN, booking officers can take up to eight digital photographs of a suspect's face and distinguishing markings—scars, birthmarks, tattoos, etc.—and upload the images to the CPIN photo respository for access by law enforcement.
PCCD also funded the procurement of facial recognition capabilities which allow trained users to compare unknown photos of varying quality with the stored photos. Agencies no longer have to purchase dedicated equipment to build photo lineups or use investigative tools.
Training and Accrediting Law Enforcement
Accreditation strengthens the professionalism of law enforcement in the Commonwealth. It is also a time-proven means for helping institutions evaluate and improve their overall performance. The program is affordable, Pennsylvania-specific, and user-friendly.
Benefits
Accreditation benefits agencies by achieving these results:
- Establishing a reliable framework for evaluating current procedures;
- Reinforcing the planning process;
- Encouraging problem solving and innovation;
- Improving management practices;
- Upgrading community services and relations;
- Expanding employees’ viewpoints, participation, and confidence;
- Extending agency accountability to the public and elected officials;
- and reducing insurance expenses and exposure to lawsuits.
By comparing their operations to professional accreditation standards, institutions can determine what is needed to fill any gaps. The Pennsylvania Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission members, the accreditation staff, and accreditation coalition support groups throughout the state are available to assist with the process.
Process
The three-step, accreditation process is simple and thorough:
1. Application.
Once a police department and local government officials have decided to pursue accreditation, they send a Letter of Intent along with an application fee of $100 to the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association (PCPA). PCPA then send out a packet of material which includes manuals, support materials, software-tracking and an orientation video.
2. Self-Assessment
The accreditation manager compares how the agency’s current policies comply with the program’s 123 standards. Most agencies will discover that they are closer to compliance than anticipated. Thereafter, the group will host a mock assessment, with support from the accreditation staff and other resources, to help prepare for the third phase.
3. Formal Assessment
In this final phase, trained assessors conduct an onsite, two-day review of the agency’s alignment with all standards and, if fully aligned, grants accreditation to the organization. Accreditation remains valid for three years.
The Pennsylvania Virtual Training Network (PAVTN)
The Pennsylvania Virtual Training Network (
PAVTN) was launched in January 2012. PAVTN provides interactive on-line courses to thousands of law enforcement officers, primarily local police.
The purpose of creating the VTN was to allow small departments to train more of their officers, to save significant dollars on travel and to encourage connections between law enforcement officials across the Commonwealth. The results have been extremely successful. The savings in travel and tuition for municipal police departments is substantial. Almost 2,000 officers have been trained. Plans are also in the works for a message board to allow participants to interact with their counterparts from around the state. One course, Investigating Strangulation, has become a model used by the U .S. Department of Justice and has attracted even international police officers.
Presently, there are 16 courses available online. The courses available are both those that are mandatory and those that are elective for officers. They include topics that will be immediately useful, such as Fingerprinting Compliance, Responding to Domestic Violence Calls and DUI Crackdowns, and those that are more specialized, such as Investigating Sexual Assault or Investigating Strangulation.
PAVTN is a logical method to save time and money by bringing training to officers rather than having the officers travel to a training site. Over 6,300 officers have enrolled to take all four of their mandatory training courses online. There are almost 9,800 registered users of PAVTN. The 16 available courses provide over 44,000 hours of training.
Beyond the obvious cost-savings, PAVTN serves the function of allowing far more officers to be trained because it is so cost-efficient. Participants access the training at no cost to their agencies. This leads to more consistency in training across departments and ultimately to more qualified, more prepared local police departments.
The idea of using virtual training for Pennsylvania law enforcement officers was established by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) and the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association (PCPA). It is unique in that federal funds from both the Office on Violence Against Women and Bureau of Justice Administration were combined to create the network and support the ongoing development of new coursework. Funds from the Federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have also been used. It represents a unique collaboration between law enforcement and the victim service providers.
One of the most user friendly aspects of the PAVTN system is that users may access the courses whenever and wherever they like. Courses may be accessed 24/7 and at a user’s convenience. Courses may also be taken in small segments, with a user able to refresh him/herself on the material before continuing. It is a completely individualized study and offers short quizzes during the training to ensure the material is being understood.
PAVTN is operated and administered by staff of PCPA. The agency also provides general guidance and oversight of the creation of courses, monitors the reaction to them, troubleshoots any technical issues that arise and keeps records of the participants. PCPA also oversees the content of the courses.
PAVTN is only available to registered users; however, to check if you or your organization is eligible, contact PCPA at cjbraun@paachiefs.org or 717-236-1059.
The Law Enforcement Justice Information System (LEJIS)
The Law Enforcement Justice Information System (LEJIS) is an innovative police data sharing system that works in conjunction with the Pennsylvania Justice Network (JNET). LEJIS is transforming the way law enforcement agencies in Pennsylvania access and share local, state, and federal public safety records. For the first time in Pennsylvania, participating law enforcement agencies have near-real-time access to each other’s police incident reports. With information more readily available, police officers and sheriffs are better equipped to increase their own safety, while detectives and District Attorneys can conduct more efficient investigations.
LEJIS improves patrol officer safety by providing near-real-time incident data to police in the field through their own agency’s RMS. It also enables investigators and supervisors to coordinate their investigations with other agencies and has led to many successful cross-jurisdictional investigations. LEJIS users can quickly identify whether other law enforcement agencies have had prior contact with an individual, a piece of property or a vehicle, and provides follow-up contact information.
- LEJIS now connects over 380 law enforcement agencies throughout Pennsylvania, including the City of Philadelphia Police Department and the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Police.
- Thirty percent of the police departments in Pennsylvania are connected covering > 50% of the population.
- Over 10,000,000 incidents have already been shared.
- Over 600,000 searches have been conducted over the past two years.
- The Corbett Administration awarded LEJIS an Award for Local Government Excellence in 2011 in the category Information Technology for its innovation and success.
LEJIS is a data-driven, pointer index system, not a data warehouse. Police incident reports are not stored in the LEJIS index. Rather, each time a police department enters or modifies person, property or vehicle data in its RMS, the department’s RMS automatically submits and stores some of the report’s data in the LEJIS index. LEJIS users may rapidly search the index to help them solve cases.
Police departments participating in LEJIS maintain control over their RMS data. The executive officer of each department determines which incidents or incident categories get shared. If a new incident is added to their local RMS and is sharable, it automatically gets uploaded. If a previously shared record gets updated, those updates get sent to the LEJIS Index. Finally, if a previously shared record or information from a record, such as an individual’s name, gets deleted from the local RMS, it gets deleted from the LEJIS Index. This is to ensure synchronization between local RMSs and the LEJIS Index.
At present, several RMS vendors are certified to participate in LEJIS including Metro Technology Services, Cody, Informant Technologies, VisionAir, and DataWorksPlus (cNET contractor).
LEJIS is a partner with the Pennsylvania Justice Network (JNET). JNET provides a secure platform for police departments to share their RMS data. Transitioning LEJIS from its current governance to a technology project managed directly by JNET continues to proceed as planned. The Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency in partnership with the Pennsylvania District Attorney’s Association undertook the first actions supporting this goal by contracting with EJIS technology contractors to provide operations and maintenance through 2014.
Law enforcement officials can gain access to LEJIS either through their police department’s RMS, or by logging into JNET, navigating to the Secure Home Page, clicking on the Justice Data link, and then selecting the LEJIS link.
For further information on connecting to LEJIS, please contact either Chief Tom Medwid, the LEJIS Steering Committee Chairman at 215-256-9500 or tmedwid@lowersalfordtownship.org. Also visit our public project website at www.LEJIS.net to learn more about the project.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Justice Information Sharing Initiative (MARIS)
The Mid-Atlantic Regional Justice Information Sharing (MARIS) Initiative grew out of a MARIS Forum sponsored by the Maryland Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention in June of 2012. The MARIS Forum showcased initial efforts and success stories involving inter-state justice information sharing. As a result, representatives from several states met in Philadelphia in September 2012 and from that meeting, three states (Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia (D.C.) determined to pursue three distinct phases or priorities to promote criminal justice information sharing in the Mid-Atlantic. The first two phases involve direct/bulk exchange of data with the third phase including specific query/response on a person of interest.
Direct portal sharing will enable JNET users inter-state shared access to each of the MARIS partners and provide a single source for justice information. Given the density and mobility of the offender populations in these jurisdictions, the sharing of justice information was deemed critical to the administration of justice and public safety in the Mid-Atlantic multi-state region.
Priority I - Arrest Sharing expansion is relatively low-risk, cost-effective, has limited legal and policy implications, and will promote stronger public safety outcomes with near real-time alerts going to parole and probation officers regarding their clientele’s arrests in the Mid-Atlantic. Currently, Pennsylvania is sharing arrest information with Maryland, via a point-to-point Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA), enabling data to be moved back-and-forth.
Pennsylvania is already seeing positive rewards and returns from the MARIS arrest information sharing. Since Maryland began sharing arrest data with Pennsylvania on 12/1/2012, Pennsylvania has confirmed 419 actively monitored parolees and probationers have been arrested in Maryland, indicating about two active Pennsylvania parolees and probationers are arrested in Maryland on a daily basis. It is important to note that only 23 of 53 Pennsylvania counties are reporting hit confirmations on Maryland arrests via the JNET notifications application. In addition, a few of the larger Pennsylvania parole and probation counties that border Maryland are not reporting positive hit confirmations. So, the rewards are, in all probability, better than what is being reported. By expanding arrest sharing to D.C., Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Virginia, and West Virginia, Pennsylvania can expect to receive greater averages and more positive rewards and returns. All participating states and D.C. are supportive of the arrest sharing phase, reviewing a multi-state MOU agreement, enabling MARIS to share arrests with all partners. All states are in the initiation, review, or approval phase of the multi-state MOU with Pennsylvania legal recommending amending the existing IGA to accomplish this objective.
Priority II - Sharing Pennsylvania’s actively published criminal and child support warrants is also relatively low-risk and cost-effective with limited legal and policy implications. This phase will promote stronger public safety and child support program outcomes with near real-time alerts going to parole and probation and child support enforcement officers regarding their clientele’s warrants in the Mid-Atlantic.
Even though this phase has not yet started, we expect it to be quickly implemented, using a similar multi-state legal MOU/IGA mechanism from the arrest expansion described above. No firm metrics exist for out-of-state warrants being issued on Pennsylvania active clientele; however, Pennsylvania has and maintains over 13,000 active child support warrants on any given day. As of October 16, 2013, Pennsylvania had over 1.6 million active statewide warrants in the Magisterial District Judge System (MDJS) and over 141,000 active warrants in the Common Pleas Case Management System (CPCMS). This MDJS break-down includes; 36,689 active criminal warrants, 6,251 active miscellaneous warrants, 593,369 active non-traffic warrants and 1,036,024 active traffic warrants. The CPCMS breakdown includes; 120,725 active criminal warrants, 193 active dependency warrants, 2,222 active juvenile warrants, 27 active juvenile miscellaneous warrants, 6,551 active miscellaneous warrants, 10,337 active summary warrants 994 active summary appeal warrants. All told, Pennsylvania has over 1.8 million active warrants.